科学学与科学技术管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (04): 3-17.

• 科技战略与政策 •    下一篇

“创城”与人才集聚 ——基于创新型城市的准自然实验

  

  1. 1. 中国科学技术大学 管理学院,合肥 230026;2. 中国科学技术大学 公共事务学院,合肥 230026; 3. 中国科学技术大学 知识产权研究院,合肥 230026;4. 哈佛大学 法学院,美国马萨诸塞州 MA02138
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-08 出版日期:2024-04-10 发布日期:2024-04-28
  • 通讯作者: 黄加顺,jh993@ustc.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:熊学丽(1987— ),女,汉族,重庆人,中国科学技术大学管理学院博士研究生,公共事务学院硕士研究生,研究方向: 公共管理与经济政策、创新与科技管理;郁港宁(1998— ),男,汉族,安徽省亳州人,中国科学技术大学公共事务学院硕士研 究生,研究方向:公共管理与经济政策、创新与科技管理;黄加顺(1989— ),男,汉族,广东省汕头人,牛津大学博士,哈佛大学 劳动与经济研究中心高级研究员,中国科学技术大学公共事务学院、知识产权研究院特任研究员,博士生导师,研究方向:公共 管理与经济政策、创新与科技管理、环境与经济。
  • 基金资助:
    中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金(WK2160000020);安徽省高校院所知识产权运营能力提升计划项目(BJ2160000073)

"City Building" and Talent Agglomeration: A Quasi-Natural Experiment Study Based on Innovative City Pilot

  1. 1. School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 23006, China; 2. School of Public Affairs, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China; 3. Institute of Intellectual Property, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China; 4. Law School, Harvard University, Cambridge MA02138, USA
  • Received:2022-08-08 Online:2024-04-10 Published:2024-04-28

摘要: 城市创建是中国城市运动式治理的一种表现形式,在城市发展中有着关键性作用,其对城市的人才集聚影响如 何?还有待进一步研究。将创新型城市试点视作准自然实验,基于 2003—2019 年全国 256 个地级市面板数据,构建多 时点双重差分模型,探究城市创建对地方人才集聚的影响效应。结果发现:创新型城市试点能够促进地方人才集聚,同 时具有明显的地区差异,其中,中西部和东北地区的政策效应非常显著,而东部城市不显著。机制分析表明,城市创建 所带来的产业结构升级可以推动地方人才集聚水平的提升。

关键词: 创新型城市试点, 人才集聚, 城市创建, 双重差分法

Abstract: City building is a form of mobilized governance campaign in China and a crucial component of city development. It plays a significant role in the city development of China. However, its impact on the talent agglomeration remains underexplored. This study examines the impact of city building on talent agglomeration, focusing on the innovative city pilot policy. In 2006, China put forward a proposal to become an Innovation Nation. The pilot programme for innovative cities was initiated by Shenzhen in 2008. As of 2023, there were 78 pilot cities. Previous studies have confirmed that innovative city construction can provide numerous benefits to cities, such as raising the level of urban innovation, promoting industrial upgrading, and improving the ecological environment. This study focuses on the relationship between innovative city pilots and talent agglomeration, regional heterogeneity, and its mechanism. The results provide evidence for local governments to develop innovation strategies and policies for attracting talent. This study examines the impact of city building on local talent agglomeration in China, using the innovative city pilot as a quasi-natural experiment. A time-varying difference-in-differences (DID) model is constructed based on panel data from 256 prefecture-level cities between 2003 and 2019. Control variables, including city's economic level, education level, population density, openness, and medical service, are taken into account. The empirical analysis is conducted in the following steps. Firstly, the parallel trend test is performed. Secondly, the study examines the regression results with and without control variables, and separately considers the fixed effects of city and year. Thirdly, a placebo test is conducted using a counterfactual approach. The estimated coefficients' robustness is ensured by randomising the sample and constructing a pseudo-experimental group 1,000 times. Finally, this study analyses the mechanism by exploring regional heterogeneity and mediating effects. The results show that the innovative city pilot policy can significantly improve the level of talent agglomeration, while regional differences also stand out. The influence on eastern cities was insignificant, while the influence on the other areas including middle, western, and northeast China was significant and positive. The mechanism analysis reveals that industrial structure upgrading is the mediating variable of pilot policies affecting talent agglomeration. This study suggests that implementing innovative pilot policies can have a positive impact on talent agglomeration and elicit varying effects in different regions. Mechanism analysis reveals that regional heterogeneity and industrial trans-fer are the primary reasons. As a result of the industrial structure upgrade in the east, some labour-intensive industries have been relocated to other regions. As other regions actively undertake the transfer of industries, the presence of industries attracts a large number of talented individuals, thereby promoting talent agglomeration in the city. Based on these findings, this study proposes policy recommendations. Firstly, it suggests expanding the geographical scope of the pilot innovative cities, with a particular focus on increasing support for the central, western, and northeastern regions. Secondly, it suggests improving the evaluation system for pilot innovative cities. Thirdly, this study recommends strengthening the talent system by focusing not only on cultivating 'high-precision', 'top-notch', and 'shortage' talents but also on cultivating and supplying skilled talents. Furthermore, it is important to establish a diverse talent identification system and optimise talent policies to encourage the return of local talents and attract foreign talents. This study offers academic and practical implications. The findings verify the impact of city building on talent mobility and innovative cities, which enriches the literature on this theme. Additionally, it provides strategic guidance for the future construction of innovative cities and has practical value for promoting high-quality development of the local economy and society.

Key words: innovative cities pilot, talent agglomeration, urban construction, difference-in-differences

中图分类号: