科学学与科学技术管理 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 83-98.

• 科技创新与创业 • 上一篇    下一篇

颠覆性技术异化及其治理研究——以“深度伪造”技术的典型化事实为例

  

  1. (1. 清华大学国际关系研究院,北京100084;2. 北京理工大学管理与经济学院,北京100081;3. 清华大学自动化系,北京100084;4. 清华大学经济管理学院,北京100084)
  • 出版日期:2020-12-10 发布日期:2021-01-08
  • 作者简介:苗争鸣(1990—),男,安徽亳州人,清华大学国际关系研究院,博士研究生,马里兰大学国际与安全研究中心访问学者,研究方向:技术与国际关系,数据安全。

The Alienation of Disruptive Technology and Governance: Based on the Stylized Fact of "Deepfake" Technology

  1. (1. Institute of International Relations, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 2. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China; 3. Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 4. School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)
  • Online:2020-12-10 Published:2021-01-08

摘要: 颠覆性技术异化是指在新兴颠覆性技术研发、应用和演进过程中,在技术至上主义和功利主义价值观驱使下,背离“以人为本”的人本主义精神,实现非正当收益并损害人和社会全面可持续发展的现象。颠覆性技术异化已成为数字化时代的威胁和人类社会可持续发展的重要挑战,然而鲜有针对颠覆性技术异化的成因、异化机制、影响和治理路径的系统性研究。基于责任式创新理论,应用跨学科研究视角,以“深度伪造”这一新兴颠覆性技术异化的典型化事实为例,系统探究颠覆性技术创新及应用过程中的异化现象,分析其源起、本质和潜在的风险后果,并探讨如何通过治理机制创新,提升颠覆性技术治理能力,推动负责任的技术创新和整合性价值创造。为责任式创新理论作出贡献,并为颠覆性技术治理能力与治理体系现代化提供实践启示。

国家自然科学基金应急管理项目(71941026);北京理工大学优秀青年教师学术启动计划(3210011182020)

关键词: 颠覆性技术, 技术异化, 深度伪造, 责任式创新, 治理能力现代化

Abstract: Disruptive technology alienation refers to that technology was used to obtain illegal gains during the process of the development and application of emerging technology, which deviates from its original purpose and contradicts its mission of serving the human society. Disruptive technology alienation is based on the concept of technology supreme, which lead to technological development and application that violates laws or social ethics. It has become a threat to the digital era and an critical challenge for both national and global sustainable development goals (SDGs). However, relatively little study has systematically investigated the disruptive technology alienation. This study explores the alienation in the process of innovation and application of disruptive technology. In this paper we are trying to contribute to the current research on disruptive innovation and provides practical inspiration to cope with the challenge of technology alienation and improve the governance capacity of disruptive technologies. Drawing from responsible innovation theory and combing with interdisciplinary research perspectives, this dynamic and a process of rapid evolution and cyclical strengthening. Therefore, the risks and potential consequences brought about by disruptive technological alienation have many characteristics such as high degree of impact, all-roundness, durability and irreversibility. The main risk consequences of disruptive technological alienation are concentrated in the four aspects of technology civilianization, public opinion governance, social trust, and national security risks. 
In conclusion, it is necessary to implement responsible innovation mindset and people-oriented scientific and technological ethics during the process of innovation and commercialization of disruptive technologies. On the one hand, both the government, firms and individuals could work together from "technology-individual motivation-organizational management-national security-cultural values" and other multi-level and multi-dimensional approaches, to deal with the disruptive technology alienation, and accelerate progress disruptive technology governance capabilities and modernization of governance systems ensure that science and technology are responsible, so that disruptive technological innovations could continue to empower national development and people’s health and happiness.
On the other hand, China should also actively seek international cooperation, build a disruptive technology collaborative innovation and governance platform for co-governance and sharing, as well as work together with international players to respond to international public security risks, and apply the mindset of "technology for good" to contribute the overall sustainable development of human society.

Key words: disruptive technology, technology alienation, deepfake, responsible innovation, governance capacity
modernization